The Cat Dish
  • Musings
  • Food
  • #CatTravels
  • #BabyFox
  • #40trails
  • Videos
  • About Me
  • Contact

Toning shoes: ugly and ineffective

By Catherine Toth Fox • July 14, 2011 • Musings, The Daily Dish

To anyone wearing those hideous toning shoes, some relief.

You don’t have to embarrass yourself in public anymore.

According to several studies — including a recent one, the results presented last month at the annual meeting of the American College of Sports Medicine — muscle activation and oxygen consumption were almost identical whether the women wore toning or normal walking shoes.

Meaning, those rocker-shaped soles that promise to tighten your calves, thighs and butt don’t do anything ordinary shoes would. Yes, even if they “feel” different.

I’ll admit: I’ve been tempted to spend the $100 or so to buy one of these miracle shoes and walk my way to a fitter body. But like anything that sounds too good to be true, it is.

It’s amazing, though, how companies are able to get away with what essentially is misleading (not necessarily false) advertising. On the SKECHERS website, it says its Shape-ups will “tone your muscles, promote healthy weight loss and make it easy to get in shape.”

While the claims may not be entirely true, if people — namely, women — buy these shoes and actually start walking, that’s a good thing. And I’m guessing some women have used these shoes to get back into shape — and may not have even attempted it had it not been for the convincing sales pitch.

If that’s enough to get people out there and moving, I suppose the shoes have done their job.

I’m just glad I didn’t buy into it. Otherwise, I would have an ugly pair of useless shoes.

athletic shoesfitnessHawaiihealthReebokShape-upsSKECHERStoning shoes
Tweet
15
Dog Patrol: Missing chihuahua/terrier
Today's happy shot

About the Author

Catherine Toth Fox

You Might Also Like

  • Anyone Else Feeling Like You’re Failing at This?

  • It’s Hard To Say Goodbye—So I Won’t

  • Was 2020 Really That Bad?

  • Here’s What Happened To My Dog Indy

15 Comments

  • Reply oldshoes July 14, 2011 at 1:41 am

    hmmm, i dunno about this one. i’d definately like to talk to someone who has actually used them first,before i believe “several studies” who say nay. i would buy them myself before believing the studies,based solely on Joe Montana’s pitch. way more credible than the thigh master or any ab-cruncher machine. The thigh master is actually really great when used as a pilates back strengthener,and now they are only like $5 at any second hand store! But i digress. Yes,any good running shoes and a hill or set of stairs will do the same as the “rocker’ claim.But if one is a flat-lander i’d give it a try.Still better than a pet rock…

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:04 am

      Thigh Master! Do they still make those???

  • Reply David Jackson July 14, 2011 at 2:23 am

    PT Barnum was right… if you walk 4 or 5 miles daily… an hour to hour and a half out of your life you will have plenty of tone. My question is to my mind a little more important. When is it going to sink in that the space between your ears is likely the best place to attempt to tone things up? Golf is a great illustrator of this. Name a single professional golfer that thinks anything other than the mental game is the most important aspect of their success. Yet people spend a God awful amount of money buying the latest equipment and working out to play a sport that most strokes are lost because of what is happening between your ears. So maybe someone should make a ‘get you act together’ hat. I’d buy one 🙂

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:06 am

      I need a “get your act together” hat. Imagine what I could accomplish!

      About walking, on a side note, I’m a big believer that that’s all you need. Serious walking, though. When I injured my back a few years ago, I wasn’t allowed to do anything BUT walk. (I couldn’t even drive.) So I walked for 45 minutes twice a day. Lost more weight doing that than anything else.

  • Reply M July 14, 2011 at 6:56 am

    Hello Cat, I never believed those shoes ever worked when it appeared on the market.

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:07 am

      I desperately wanted to believe in those shoes! Looked like such an easy way to lose weight. But like the old saying goes, “If it’s too good to be true….”

  • Reply WildeOscar July 14, 2011 at 8:03 am

    The next thing you know, I’m going to find that this shampoo I have been using doesn’t really leave my hair 5-times silkier. At least I haven’t been strapping the bottle to my head. Ugly shoes? Yeah, I guess they are kind of clunky.

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:07 am

      LOL!

  • Reply matt July 14, 2011 at 9:27 am

    I asked my chiropractor about them and she said that she loves them. they bring in a lot of business to her from people who use them then screw up their lower backs.

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:07 am

      It’s all about job security!

  • Reply MaxMaxMax July 14, 2011 at 10:17 am

    Reminds me of my old vet and how they used to push “Science Diet” on me!

    Cat, did you ever see the movie “Elizabethtown” written/directed by Cameron Crowe? The main character (Orlando Bloom) hides away in shame after his pet project “Späsmodica” shoes were a flop and lost his company a billion dollars! Life imitates art here!

    As for product advertisement, as long as any fraction of their claim is true, they can make that claim. I remember a former FDA honcho citing in an interview that the “Dreamaway” product that promoted weight loss while you slept could get away with those claims, even though in their tests, it didn’t work at all. That is because as humans, we ALL loss weight when we sleep as a natural process.

    Gotta watch them snake oil salesmen!

    • Reply David Jackson July 14, 2011 at 10:55 am

      The FDA ruled years ago that packaging that said new and improved were legal even if there was no difference in the internal product. Indeed the package itself was ‘new and improved’ because it created a ‘new and improved’ impression. It was a landmark ruling!

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:08 am

      No, I didn’t. I’ll put it on my Netflix!

      Interesting about the ruling, though. (See below) Snake oil is next!

  • Reply olu July 14, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    You know what else is crazy? When you go to Famous Footwear, there are three rows of ugly shaping shoes by a bunch of different makers and just one row of running shoes now. Does that mean nobody is running and everyone is just using platform sneakers?

    • Reply Catherine Toth July 17, 2011 at 8:08 am

      Platform sneakers! Maybe they can repackage these shoes as that! I bet folks would still buy ’em!

Leave a Reply Cancel Reply

About Me

About Me
Born and raised on O‘ahu, Hawaiʻi, Catherine Toth Fox has been chronicling her adventures in her blog, The Cat Dish, for more than a decade. She worked as a newspaper reporter in Hawai‘i for 10 years and continues to freelance—in between teaching journalism, hitting the surf and eating everything in sight—for national and local print and online publications. She’s currently the editor of HAWAIʻI Magazine.

Latest Posts

  • Anyone Else Feeling Like You’re Failing at This?

    March 8, 2022
  • It’s Hard To Say Goodbye—So I Won’t

    January 29, 2021
  • Was 2020 Really That Bad?

    December 31, 2020
  • Here’s What Happened To My Dog Indy

    December 10, 2020
  • I Did Noom For a Month and Here’s What Happened

    October 7, 2020

Made with in Seattle

© 2013 Solo Pine Designs, Inc. All rights reserved.